http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2009/12/23/the-end-of-advisory-support-
Back on the 4th December the DCSF published its timetable for school improvement. Lots of the announcements were already known, 1-to-1 tuition, the School Record Card, but what perhaps did not make the press was the demise of LA advice and support services and their replacement by a “market place” of accredited providers. These changes are covered in Chapter 3 of the document, Your child, your schools, our future: building a 21st century schools system - Timetable for action. Here’s a quick synopsis:
A) Role of LA changed; devolution of ’school improvement resources currently held centrally’ to schools; co-ordination through ‘Govt Regional Offices’:
3.4 The role of DCSF in school improvement will be focused on building capacity to enable local authorities and others to discharge their school improvement responsibilities effectively. This will be within a framework of support that schools, SIPs and local authorities themselves can draw on. To enable this, we will devolve to schools most of the school improvement resources currently held centrally, and many of our field forces, grants, and subject support programmes will be decommissioned to fund self-improvement. Those that remain will be co-ordinated closely and we will explore the idea of using Government Offices to provide a focus for this work in each region and to provide a two-way flow of information between local authorities and the DCSF.
B) National College to deliver SIP programme not Strategies, Licence to Practice introduced; all SIPs to be re-accredited:
3.23 The current activities undertaken by the National Strategies will be maintained up to March 2011, when their contract ends. The National College will take responsibility for delivery of the SIP programme from April 2011, although it will undertake development work in the transition period, learning from the experience of the National Strategies in running the programme.
C) School identifies priorities; ‘use their resources to actively seek out and draw on any support, expertise and professional development they need’ (note the list of where this might come from):
3.29 Once schools have identified their priorities, they need to set out their plans to secure the improvements required. They will need to use their resources to actively seek out and draw on any support, expertise and professional development they need, sharing their own good practice, and supporting their partners where they can. Our vision for school improvement support is one where schools:
- look in-house, so that good practice that is already within the school can be shared and applied consistently;
- draw on school-to-school support, with local authorities facilitating partnerships to spread expertise between schools;
- have free access to high-quality CPD and training products, through the internet; and
- can draw support from a varied, innovative, and competitive market of providers, which schools pay for from their delegated school improvement budgets.
D) It is the schools that commission from a ‘diverse market place’ of providers; there will be ‘central QA’:
3.32 Rather than the DCSF commissioning support which is then provided to schools, resources will be delegated to individual schools for them to use to commission the specific support they need, to meet their individual challenges. We will support schools to do so, by establishing a “market place” that:
- identifies a diverse market of school improvement services and suppliers; and
- includes central quality assurance, so that schools can feel confident in the services they commissioning.
E) These providers will be provide a range of products and services; focus on ‘engagement by a range of providers’; establishment of a ’single portal with a common Directory’:
3.33 Across the range of curriculum support and development, and school improvement activities, the DCSF will invite providers to identify products and services to meet schools’ needs and secure coverage of gaps in the market. The focus will be on developing arrangements that facilitate engagement by a range of providers, and allow schools to commission support with ease, by establishing user-friendly ‘commissioning’ arrangements, including using a single portal to access a common support Directory. This will be accompanied by guidance and good practice training for all users.
F) QA scheme will accredit providers at different levels; SIPS ‘trained to help schools operate these new arrangements’:
3.34 We will also develop arrangements to quality assure these providers, with different levels of accreditation from a light touch ‘health check’ to be a member of the market, to a more rigorous process to identify, for schools, those providers who have a proven record of securing strong improvement. In developing the role of the SIP, we will ensure that they are trained to help schools to operate within these new arrangements, helping to identify and broker the support that schools require.
G) LAs to be commissioner for its underperforming schools, and broker and facilitator for others; LA will, ‘not provide support directly’:
3.64 The local authority will be a commissioner for their underperforming schools, and a broker and a facilitator of School Improvement services to ensure that appropriate support is available for schools, but will not provide support directly, other than through the SIP. Consultancy currently operated by the local authority will be radically reduced and refocused on coordinating and commissioning support for underperforming schools which do not demonstrate a capacity to improve on their own.
H) Primary schools to need more support in change that perhaps others; LA and SIPs to ‘provide key commissioning support roles’:
3.65 We recognise that primary schools in particular may have more limited experience and expertise in commissioning services. It will therefore be important to ensure that they are supported in this role. We expect the local authority and SIPs to provide key commissioning support roles, particularly for underperforming schools causing concern.
Our current trials with Priority Learning Local Authorities are exploring how the new approach to school improvement can work,
how local authorities can lead system change, and how effective practice can be shared widely. This will include developing
regional school improvement hubs, linking local authorities, and providing regional training and professional development.”
So my take on this is that LAs role will be taken to a core. One might argue that consultants presently employed in support roles in LAs and funded by the Strategies may be recruited by the new accredited and commercial providers. However, given the economic climate it is very likely that the devolved money will be less that it is at present, and, given these providers will be competing for commissions, not only with themselves, but with other forms of support such as school-to-school, partnerships between schools etc.. I can see the workforce of consultants being reduced, and those employed, working over much larger regions than present LAs. It might be that these commercial providers adopt an ‘freelance’ approach given the diverse nature of this market, and the degree of specialism these people might need. Finally, I’m a bit cynical about some LAs not attempting to still provide the support by setting up business units and trying to get accredited, or having a close relationship with a provider to which they have redeployed staff, after all what does, “will not provide support directly” actually mean, and only if SIPs are forbidden from selling or recommended support services, can a competitive “market place” have a chance of success. Certainly it will take years to establish a culture in which school recognise they have choice and exercise it freely in some areas of the country.
The Conservatives have not pronounced on how they view schools being supported, but given they have already made pronouncements that would make schools more competitive with each other, if anything they will go further in creating a market place for support.
Image credit: Matthew Burpee
Tags: education, support, localauthority, consultant, consultancy